A BCBA publishes a book describing interventions but provides no references to research. This practice:

A BCBA publishes a book describing interventions but provides no references to research. This practice:

• A. It is acceptable because the methods are standard.
• B. It is acceptable as long as the author believes them.
• C. It is a minor omission.
• D. It violates the code because it fails to credit the research upon which the methods are based.

Answer: (D)

The main idea here is that interventions should be linked to and credited by the research that supports them. In behavior analysis, showing the evidence base behind a method isn’t just nice to have—it’s essential. Providing no references makes it impossible for readers to verify findings, trace where the approach came from, or check the quality and scope of the supporting studies. It also risks presenting the techniques as original or universally accepted without evidence. Properly crediting research shows respect for the work of others, helps readers assess applicability, and maintains scientific integrity. Because the book omits these citations, it violates the code that requires citing the research upon which methods are based.

The main idea here is that interventions should be linked to and credited by the research that supports them. In behavior analysis, showing the evidence base behind a method isn’t just nice to have—it’s essential. Providing no references makes it impossible for readers to verify findings, trace where the approach came from, or check the quality and scope of the supporting studies. It also risks presenting the techniques as original or universally accepted without evidence. Properly crediting research shows respect for the work of others, helps readers assess applicability, and maintains scientific integrity. Because the book omits these citations, it violates the code that requires citing the research upon which methods are based.